Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: NathanMoore Originally by: JZIM 30 minute supercapital redock timer please kthx good idea, or even a hour or two. But this would be an amazing compromise. This could actually make sense. Do that and fix comp...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.13 22:48:00
|
2. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Lira Reib A ship that does twice as much damage but only costs 4x more than a dread lol
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.13 20:42:00
|
3. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Impolite Andevil First, why did you guys feel the need to change the supercap modifications introduced by Abathur and extensively tested to near universal approval? I have yet to see any kind of reason given for why these we...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.13 20:08:00
|
4. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Woah, horrible: - Go play docking games with a ship capable of millions of EHP, basically you are invulnerable unless someone drops a fleet of 150 dreads on you and they better bump you fast or you can still dock. - You can lose it for 2 bill. ins...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.13 19:32:00
|
5. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: fairimear this is wrong. supercarriers should be t2 carriers. make a crap texture for the current ones. give them these stats and leave ms alone. leave the vat bay in and the 20 fb's. so we have carrier - 700mill t2 super c...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.13 15:34:00
|
6. PROPOSAL: Making 0.0 space desireable again (and not Exodus II) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Supported. Some extra stuff regarding mineral distribution: - Hisec only should spawn tri & pyer related ores. - Lowsec should spawn only the other related ores low-ends. - Nullsec should spawn only ABC+M. - WH stays as it is (various sizes of bel...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.13 15:02:00
|
7. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Ivanna Nuke Can I have your stuff? Your trolling is not amusing. And no, you can't have my stuff, if it ends somewhere it would be on biomass. F*A*G.
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.13 14:47:00
|
8. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Nozh is a shared trolling gamebalance account, unpopular decissions are announced by him for damage control measures. This patch = terribad, CCP devs = terribad. First they announce the ****up of system upgrades & upkeep, they are clueless: lvl4 ...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.13 14:36:00
|
9. New Dev Blog: In-Game Browser: MoondoggieÆs Latest Adventures - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Damage Control
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.13 14:28:00
|
10. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
An other terrible change brought to you by sisipi .
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.13 10:42:00
|
11. Can you spell abuse? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Not much to worry about as I'm sure CCP use some statistical tools to filter reports & petitions. So unless a bazillion of idiots report you at the same time is not gonna work.
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.02 16:24:00
|
12. The PvE Experience: Missions and Walking in Stations - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Edited by: Uzume Ame on 02/11/2009 13:49:48 I think it's gonna be third person view, unfortunatlly, so not FPS at first. But at least I would like GTA-like missions: assesinate this guy or that guy, thiefing data disk and bringing it to your a...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.02 13:49:00
|
13. T3 production has hit the wall, and needs fixed - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Kylar Renpurs Unless you can reprocess it, or unless they change the build requirements. The latter would be a far more equitable outcome tbh. I would prefer reprocess for a single reason: it's easier for the market to r...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.02 13:21:00
|
14. EVE manufacture and reprocessing "mastersheet" (08-Feb-2009) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Also, I trimmed the "profit sort" sheet to ONLY include T1 stuff, since for T2 you would get outrageous profit margins without a BPC price set and taken into account ( it's not even taken into account right now on t...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.01 15:38:00
|
15. T3 production has hit the wall, and needs fixed - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Problem with prices not adjusting is the same one as T2 production probably: large stockpiles which were bought at different prices affect the current prices. As T3 market is SLOW the stockpiles take a while to be sold so the market can adjust to ...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.11.01 15:27:00
|
16. MI Organizer V1 - Manufacturing & Invention Calculating spreadsheet - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Uzume Ame on 23/10/2009 20:08:05 This is made of awesome, but not being able to change prices sucks :( At least tell us which indexes are you using on ECE-Central import, median empire/median all regions, lowest sell, higher buy or ...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.10.23 20:07:00
|
17. EVE: Dominion Mass-Testing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The pourpose of the test is to generate lag most probably so it doesn't matter, just be there with something shooting and moving around. If youcan use drones much better.
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.10.13 14:16:00
|
18. New Capital Rep - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It's called a carrier, silly. No need for redudant ship classes.
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.10.13 12:40:00
|
19. The forums - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I pay just to post on the forums.
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.09.14 11:39:00
|
20. Sleeper Level AI in mission rats is the day drones are screwed - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
the problem with sleeper 'ai' is they allways focus fire on one target, including drones. it's pretty difficult for a player gang to focus fire on a single drone, this shouldn't be as easy for sleepers. random shooting of different at once drones...
- by Uzume Ame - at 2009.08.03 11:48:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |